September 5, 2012
Deidre M. Singleton
PO Box 23241
Philadelphia, PA. 19124
Email: Deidre_singleton@hotmail.com
Phone: 804-304-8649

RE: Concerns for Two Teen-men

To Whomever Concerned,
I am contacting your agency at this time as a result of court action initiated against me in Aiken Summary Court by an elderly woman of 66-years (an ex-mother-in-law Elizabeth Legare Singleton of 6 Spyglass Dr, Aiken, SC 29803) who is raising two teenaged young-men (my two sons). Unless the court changes the date I have been summoned to appear on September 12th @ 1030AM to show cause as to why a restraining order requested by this individual (for which harassment charges have been filed by me with the Philadelphia Police Department and I intend to file same with the Aiken Police Department as the accusations in the restraining order against me in Aiken are frivolous, deceptive, and addressing matters with discrepancies that occurred nearly 10-years ago; hence, this action is intended to instigate, incite, bully, and harass).
My inspiration for initiating this contact with Family services is out of concern for the posterities of two young-men, RQue (Reginald, 15 years) and Terrence (13 years). Healthy people with healthy minds value and nurture relationships that are rewarding and productive to their existence and avoid or ignore caustic relationships allowing them to disintegrate. People that thrive on dysfunction (such as my sons’ paternal grandmother) of course will continue to resuscitate dead and meaningless relationships as this woman is doing as a result of her decision to interject her ill-will back into my life after nearly 10 years of no contact even if doing so is risking catastrophe because she knows of no other course of action (aside from that which is dysfunctional). Avoidance behaviors are not within her purview. The elders of RQue and Terrence’s family has done enough damage for 3 generations it is now up to these two young-men to make decisions about their relationships for the decades going forward and at age 15 RQue has indeed reached that age of maturity to at least allow his wishes regarding his maternal family to be heard (something he nor his brother was able to do when they were orphaned at age 5 and 7 years of age). The problem here Dear Sirs or Madams is that there is no one to enlighten or give them permission to exercise their privileges of humanity (to speak on their own behalves) reaping the rewards of growing into mature conscientious young-men. 
I beseech you to investigate their well-being, as well as their psychological, and emotional desires to reconnect to those they were taken from; furthermore, if it is within the authority of your office it would also be my prayer for you to refer the Elder Singleton to undergo psychological and emotional evaluation to insure she is not afflicted with dementia, Alzheimer’s, or some other ailment common to those of advanced years.  It is a blessing to these young men to have grown up without their lives being constantly influenced by ‘courthouse-parenting’, illustrating that it is proper to have family relationships defined by court actions and restraints. This action initiated by the Matriarch of the Singleton family is contradictory to maintaining already severed ties between she and I; initiating this contact with me based on old proclamations from nearly 10-years ago without anything new to proclaim is unwise at best and is not in the best interest of two young men who have had enough chaos in their young lives. Please refer this prayer for investigation to the proper entities within your agency if it is outside of your purview to initiate these actions. My actions is that of a concerned citizens who has been unjustifiably invited into this strange situation and it causes me great alarm for my descendants that have been in the care of this wily Matriarch for years now by no choice of their own. 
To avoid repeating myself to share with you as much info as possible, I will enclose letters I have written to the Judge and the Boys’ schools as a result to these actions initiated by Elizabeth in the Aiken Summary Court. I am in the 9th week of a 10 week quarter of my Doctoral Program, I had no intentions of scribing pages-and-pages of emotional recoiling matters-of-fact or opinion; however, with this action initiated in my sons’ home town I am compelled to respond as I even as a parent in absentia has a right to affect all that is at issue regarding the lineage and posterities of those I borne.
Thank you for your considerations,

Deidre Singleton